Drinks That Cause Tooth Decay Health Essay

Drinks That Cause Tooth Decay Health EssayThe depicted object in the drinks that founts tooth decay is the ditic subject in our nutrient and beverages. In general, drinks with a pH below 5.0 5.7 confuse been known to trigger dental consonant corrosion. Previous scientific research findings have helped to warn consumers that the pH aim in beverages could lead to tooth wear, the breakdown of tooth structure buildd by the demigod and leads to tooth decay. The tartness take in popular beverages that we consume e preciseday leads to the erosion of e touch onl. dental erosion is the irreversible loss of a tooth delinquent to chemical decay by back breakers non of bacteriuml origin. There is generally widespread ignorance of the transplant personal effects of acid erosion this is take leaveicularly the case with erosion due to produce succuss, be bring forth they tend to be seen as wellnessy. corrosion is found ab initio in the enamel and if unchecked, may procee d to the underlying structure of a tooth. Numerous clinical and science lab reports link erosion to excessive phthisis of drinks, fruit succuss such as o persona juice (which contain citric acid) and carbonated drinks (citric and phosphoric acid). This essay examines scientific research of the issue to look out if, in fact, acidic drinks do cause tooth decay. As part of my research, I conducted my own essay, using human odontiasis and different types of drinks. subsequentlywardswards considering the results I sireed, as well as other research, I conclude that acid contain in the drinks is the cause of tooth decay. The acid content provide lento dissolve the enamel of the dentitioning. It dissolves the calcium molecules from the odontiasis get hold, thus the odontiasis get out erode. This essay will examine the validity of acid content in the drinks as the real culprit to tooth decay, evaluate the extend of the damage and recommendations for prudish tooth c be.In troductionTooth decay is the loss of enamel from the tooth surface. When cultivated cabbagey drinks ar consumed by bacteria in the mouth, it turns the kail into acids. These acids corrode the enamel of the dentition, which leads to cavities. Dental erosion is the irreversible loss of a tooth to chemical dis closure by acids not of bacteria origin. Tooth decay is the most common chronic disease for children sr. 5 17 although it is only recently that it is recognized as a dental health paradox. There is generally widespread ignorance of the damaging effects of acid erosion, this particularly due to fruit juices, because they ar perceived to be healthy. erosion is initially found in the enamel and if left unchecked, may proceed to the underlying structure of a tooth. Numerous clinical and testing ground reports linked erosion to excessive drug addiction of sweet drinks, carbonated drinks and fruit juices. Previous scientific research findings have help to warn consumers that the pH (potential of hydrogen) level below pH 5.0 5.7 may initiate dental erosion.The consumption behaviour plays a major role in oral health. However, unexclusive awareness on dental erosion is not high. Sources of acids can be endogenous or exogenous, and erosive intensity is modified by feature and quantity of saliva. sulphurous beverages are the most common extrinsic factors that cause dental erosion (tooth decay). Because of these identified factors, I am inte quietused to do this research to clear my curiosity.Basically this look into is through to support my hypothesis. The look into consists of gathering extracted human odontiasis of various shapes and surfaces, disinfection and the submission in the selected beverages. era of 5 calendar months is needed to complete the whole essay. With the findings, I will be convinced and qualified to convince that acidic beverages cause tooth decay.Review of publications crumb JuiceThe juice extracted from fresh rotter is utilise as refreshing beverage. People go for lemon juice because they are capable to cool down our body temperature. This is why when people are sick, they are advised to drink more citric juices so that the body carcass can be cooled down and recover the patients. excessively that, lemon juice excessively has high content of Vitamin C which is essential to our body repellent system.2.2 blastCoke is a very famous carbonated drink. disdain the fizzy feeling and sweet tasting of the drink, it is in reality one of the principal(prenominal) contributors to tooth decay. Coke is a very sweet beverage do it able to promote the growth of oral bacteria, which is known as Streptococcus mutan1as the sugar contained in coke can feed the bacteria. Coke contains phosphoric acid and has the ability to corrode the tooth enamel. summation, coke can stain the teeth and forms caries on the surface of the teeth2.2.3 cocoa coffee berry causes calcium loss in our bone mound, which leads to the excretion of calcium from our bones, doesnt matter which part of our body it is. This causes the thinning of the teeth which in turn, causes the teeth to become exhausted and is vulnerable to corrosion or break. Furthermore, coffee is to a fault mostly acidic, which in like manner causes tooth erosion, then leads to tooth decay3.2.4 Energy DrinkEnergy drinks can also cause tooth decay. The pH level of the drink can lead to tooth erosion and hypersensitivity. It causes the breakdown of the tooth structure. In energy drinks, it is not the acidity of the drink that cause tooth erosion, but it is the buffering capacity of the drink that corrodes the tooth. Buffering capacity is the ability to neutralize acid4. Energy drinks have high buffering capacity, making them to have the strongest potential to cause tooth erosion.2.5 carbohydrate answerSugar is scientifically known as sucrose, a sweet tasting organic compound, derived from glucose and fructose. Streptococcus mutans which live in our oral cavity will react with the sugar and form lactic acid which will also causes tooth erosion. Sucrose will be converted into dextran which favors the bacteria to be attracted to the teeth. Dextran is the food for the oral bacteria and lactic acid is their unfounded product5. Therefore, those bacteria will just stick to the teeth. This will extend to it difficult to remove those bacteria6.2.6 Tap piddle systemTap weewee will not cause tooth decay as it does not have any effects on our teeth. Tap body of water is fluoride-enhanced, and it serves the purpose of making the teeth stronger and protects the teeth, making it an important teeth-protecting agent. Therefore, tap water will not stand the possibility of causing tooth decay.2.7 Tooth AnatomyAs the function of the teeth is to bite and chew food, hence, they are the first metre in the digestion of food. The long, s vanquishing canine teeth tear up food. The wide, flat molars grind and mash up food. Teeth also help us say authoritative sounds. Human have two sets of teeth in their lives, the primordial teeth (also called the baby, milk or deciduous teeth) and the permanent teeth. Children have 20 primary teeth they are replaced by the permanent teeth by closely age 13. Adult have 32 permanent teeth.7 dia universal gravitational constant of a tooth anatomy3.0 HypothesisAcid in drinks is the cause of tooth decay. Acidic drinks such as orange juice and lemon juice, the acid content will slowly dissolve the calcium in the teeth, corroding the enamel. The operation starts from the surface of the teeth, towards the inner structure of the teeth.Method Development PlanningIn order to carry out this research successfully, materials have been carefully elect to give a more promising and accurate result. Materials were carefully take up through several researches and readings from various useful sources. For my research, I have examine and researched on drinks such as lemon juice, coke, cof fee, energy drink ( one C- accession), sugar solution and tap water. The choice of tap water in my experiment is because of the neutral pH and fluoride enhancement. I have been study about the compositions of the drinks and how they actually contributed to tooth decay.This experiment was carried out in the Health Laboratory of a political sympathies Health Clinic in Sibu. All the research work was done during distributively of my college holidays. I was fortunate because I was applyed to use the apparatus like digital weighing scale, microscope and more. All the extracted human teeth were supplied by the dental clinic with consent granted by the dental officer. I was also being taught the kosher way of disinfecting the teeth with a proper disinfectant by the health staff in the laboratory. The main reason I chose to do my experiment here is because of the proper equipment available. Besides, I can also handle the teeth in a correct way to prevent myself from the bacteria.During the planning stage, Ive done a thorough research in choosing the appropriate drinks to be tested in my experiment. I chose only those drinks is because they are some of the popular drinks and are consumed the most nowadays. Besides that, these drinks are easily available in the market, disregardless whether it is in the urban or rural area. And since I am studying of the effects of these drinks on human, so children can be a ripe(p) subject for me because these drinks are mostly consumed by children. These drinks are also very affordable, so there wont be any financial problem in carrying out this experiment.As for the teeth, various types of teeth were used in this experiment. However, no specific tooth is being used due to the unavailability. These teeth range from Incisors, Canine, premolar to molar. Tooth that is with minimal erosion historied is selected for this experiment as no perfect human tooth is being extracted and readily available for such an experiment. 30 human te eth are used in this experiment. Only 30 teeth are used because it is quite difficult to get human teeth as human teeth are really pesky and dentists usually dispose them off immediately due to hygienic reason. Besides that, as for the solutions, 200ml of each solution is used. The same amount of solutions are also used each and both judgment of conviction when I modify the solutions in each beaker, one time a week.This experiment takes approximately 5 months in order to obtain a more large and accurate result. Initially the duration of the experiment was only 10 weeks as planned however no significant ex alternate can be seen. Therefore, the duration of the experiment was extended to 5 months instead because the teeth required a longer period of time to witness a significant transfer in the structure of every tooth. The experiment was carried out at room temperature, which is approximately at. This is because oral bacteria can function well at such temperature, which may con tribute to a more accurate result.The experiment was done, with permission, for using the equipment at a Clinic laboratory of a Healthcare facility in Sibu. All the extracted teeth for this study were taken from the Dental Clinic of that facility with each tooth weighs between 0.510 gram and 2.280 gram depending on various types of teeth (molar, premolar, canine and incisor) extracted and the weight of these extracted teeth. After being thoroughly washed and disinfected (to prevent any possible infections during the butt on of this experiment), specimens (extracted teeth) were alternately immersed, 5s, in each different types of drinks place in a labelled beaker ranging from A to F as followsBeaker A lemon juiceBeaker B CokeBeaker C coffee beanBeaker D 100 accessionBeaker E Sugar SolutionBeaker F Tap WaterThis study was done for duration of 5 months. This is to enable me to note significant permutes. This is needed in order for me to chart and document accurately the gr adually multifariousnesss to these teeth. A shorter duration will not show any significant changes which could be documented. The first reading will only be done after 1 month post immersion in each of the pronounced beaker filled with the experimented drinks. These readings include the documentation of the colour, material body ( pot) and the weight of each tooth after which at the end of my study I would be able to take care which of the 6 beakers show significant changes in the tooth throng. The inspection of each beaker will be done periodical for the next subsequent 5 months.Beaker A (lemon juice) Beaker B (Coke) Beaker C (coffee)Beaker D (100 incontrovertible) Beaker E (sugar water) Beaker F (tap water)In the meantime, a clean 200ml beaker was used to sum of money 200ml of lemon juice and the beaker is labelled accordingly. The pH of each drink is being measured to determine their acidity level. pH Chart from the journal of dental hygiene is being used as a guideline fo r my experiment. The diagram below show the various pH levels of frequently consumed foods and drinks below pH 5.0 5.7 which may initiate dental erosion. This step was repeated to measure out the same amount (200ml) of Coke, coffee, 100 confirming, sugar water and tap water. In the experiment, tap water acts as a control. After that, 30 teeth of almost the same size were cleaned and disinfected thoroughly with antiseptic disinfectant. The teeth must be clean and are without annoyance in order to detect new changes to the quid and contour of the teeth. Then, the teeth were alter with a hair parched to ascertain that the teeth are totally dry and no residual water detected. This is done to even off sure that the result will not be tempered. The initial plenty of each tooth was also weighted and the measurements were recorded. After the measuring processes, each of the teeth was immersed into their respective beakers ranging from beaker A to beaker F, 5 teeth per solution per b eaker due to the circumscribed amount of human teeth available. Those teeth must be immersed tout ensemble in their respective solution. After that, those 6 beakers were left in the laboratory under prototype room temperature and humidity.After a month, every tooth in the 6 beakers was individually checked and the changes which had taken place on the surface of the teeth were observed and documented with each of the tooth kitty measured. Then these teeth are re-immersed with fresh drinks (to ensure the potency of these drinks does not decline) for the subsequent month documentation. This process will be carried out at a monthly interval with fresh solution to detect any changes occurring to the mass and contour of the teeth, be it acute or gradual. At the end of the experiment which lasted for 5 months, the teeth were removed from each of the solutions and they were cleaned. After cleaning process, the teeth were dried using a hair dryer until each of them was totally dry. The final examination mass of each tooth was weighted and all the measurements were recorded as shown in the table below. At last, the data collected, which is the final mass (quantitative data) and the observation on the teeth (qualitative data) were tabulated for analysis.8Diagram of the pH level of frequently consumed food anddrinks below pH 5.0-5.7 may initiate dental erosion.5.0 Materials and Procedure5.1 MaterialsMaterials barExtracted tooth30 git juice200mlCoke200mlumber200ml100 Plus200mlSugar solution200mlTap Water200ml5.2 ApparatusApparatusmeasure200ml beaker6Forceps1Electronic balance1Magnifying glass1Hair dryer1Microscope15.3 VariablesVariablesIndependent variable distinguishable types of drinks(lemon juice, coke, coffee, 100 plus, sugar water, tap water)Dependent variableCondition of the teethConstant variableVolume of drinks used pillowcase of teeth usedTemperature of the drinksDuration of the experimentNumber of teeth used5.4 Methodology trick out 6 clean and empty beakers .Label all the 6 beakers with alphabets, ranging from A to F.Beaker A Lemon juiceBeaker B CokeBeaker C CoffeeBeaker D 100 PlusBeaker E Sugar solutionBeaker F Distilled waterIn the mean time, use a clean 200ml beaker, measure 200ml of lemon juice.Repeat step (3) with coke, coffee, 100 Plus, sugar water and distilled water.The distilled water acts as the control experiment.Then, clean 30 teeth of the same size thoroughly.Make sure that there is no plaque on them. run dry the teeth with a hair dryer.Weight the initial mass of the teeth. read the measurements.Immerse the each of the teeth into respective beakers.Label the teeth with song 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 for easy recognition.Make sure that the tooth is completely immersed in their respective solution.Leave the 6 beakers in the laboratory with a warning surrounding temperature.After 24 hours, check on the tooth in the 6 beakers and observe the changes which are taken place on the surface of the teeth. acquire the teeth from the solutions and clean them.Dry the teeth with a hair dryer and make sure that they are totally dry.Weight the final mass of the teeth. Record the measurement.Tabulate the data. entropy Collection6.1 Quantitative DataDrinkspH ValueLemon Juice2.10Coke2.30Coffee4.95100 Plus3.78Sugar Solution7.00Tap Water7.00The table shows the pH level of each drink for this study.Type of DrinkspH Value()Month chaw of Teeth/mg ()Tooth 1Tooth 2Tooth 3Tooth 4Tooth 5Lemon Juice2.1012.372.681.802.221.0522.372.671.792.211.0432.352.651.782.201.0342.332.631.752.181.0152.292.601.722.140.98Coke2.3011.822.332.061.802.4621.812.322.061.802.4431.792.302.041.782.4341.752.282.011.762.4151.752.261.981.742.39Coffee4.9511.551.742.342.261.3721.551.732.332.261.3631.541.732.322.251.3641.521.712.312.251.3551.501.692.292.241.33100 Plus3.7812.672.642.751.302.1422.662.632.751.302.1232.642.612.731.282.1042.622.602.711.252.0852.602.582.691.232.06Sugar Solution7.0011.371.462.061.472.3321.371.452.041.462.3231.351.452.031.442.3041.34 1.442.011.432.2951.331.432.001.422.28Tap Water7.0012.652.432.861.432.6322.652.432.861.432.6332.652.432.861.432.6242.642.432.851.432.6252.632.422.841.432.61The table shows the mass of the teeth throughout the experiment.6.2 Qualitative DataType of DrinksMonth wringContourMassLemon Juice1No changeNo changeNo change2No changeNo changeSlight decrease3jaundiced microscopic flaking and emollient of enamelSlight decrease4Yellowish brown wear remarkSignificant decrease5Brown wearing tell pursuant(predicate) decreaseCoke1No changeNo changeNo change2No changeNo changeSlight decrease3YellowishNo changeSlight decrease4Yellowish brownErosion illustriousSignificant decrease5BrownErosion notedConsistent decreaseCoffee1No changeNo changeNo change2YellowishNo changeSlight decrease3Yellowish brownMicroscopic flaking and emollient of enamelSlight decrease4BrownErosion notedSignificant decrease5BrownErosion notedConsistent decrease100 Plus1No changeNo changeNo change2No changeNo changeSlight decreas e3YellowishMicroscopic flaking and softening of enamelSlight decrease4YellowishErosion notedSignificant decrease5Yellowish brownErosion notedConsistent decreaseSugar Solution1No changeNo changeNo change2No changeNo changeNo change3YellowishNo changeSlight decrease4Yellowish brownErosion notedSignificant decrease5Yellowish brownErosion notedConsistent decreaseTap Water1No changeNo changeNo change2No changeNo changeNo change3No changeNo changeSlight decrease4No changeNo changeSlight decrease5YellowishNo changeSlight decreaseThe table shows the observations obtained throughout the experiment.7.0 Data Processing Analysis7.1 Data Processing7.1.1 figuring for the divergency in mass of the teeth.Formula divergency in mass =Mass in month 1- Mass in month 5Example,The 5th month (lemon juice), tooth 1 disparity ==*Same calculation use to others.Type of DrinksDifference in mass/mg ()Tooth 1Tooth 2Tooth 3Tooth 4Tooth 5Lemon Juice0.080.080.080.080.07Coke0.070.070.080.060.07Coffee0.050.050.050 .060.04100 Plus0.070.060.060.070.08Sugar solution0.040.030.060.050.05Tap water0.020.010.020.000.02The table shows the going in mass of each tooth throughout the 5 months for each drink.7.1.2 Calculation for the uncertainties of unlikeness in massFormulaUncertainty of the initial mass + incertitude of the final massExample,Therefore, difference in mass for tooth 1 in lemon juiceDifference =*Same calculation applied to others.7.1.3 Calculation for the norm difference.FormulaExample,For lemon juice*Same calculation applied to others.Type of Drinks bonny difference in mass/mgLemon juice0.08Coke0.07Coffee0.05100 Plus0.07Sugar solution0.05Tap water0.01The table shows the average difference in mass of the teeth in each drink.7.1.4 Calculations for the Standard deviation of the average difference in mass.Due to the complexity of the calculation, the standard deviation is calculated by using the Graphic Display Calculator (GDC).Steps push the STAT dismission. pack together the ENTER but ton.List the data (the average difference in mass of the 5 teeth per solution) in one of the column.Press the STAT button.Press button so that the CALC image on the screen is highlighted.Press the ENTER button.Beside the 1 Var Stats words on the screen, type the 2ND button and the name of the column that contains the data (name of the column used in step 3).Press the ENTER button.The standard deviation is equal to.The above steps are repeated to calculate the standard deviation for the teeth in the rest of the drinks.Example,For lemon juice,Key in the difference in mass of the 5 teeth in the 1st column.Based on the steps above, the GDC mechanically calculated the standard deviation, which is,.*Same calculation applied to others.Type of DrinksAverage Difference in Mass/mgStandard DeviationLemon juice0.080.004Coke0.070.007Coffee0.050.007100 Plus0.070.008Sugar Solution0.050.011Tap water0.010.009The table shows the average difference in mass of the teeth with the standard deviation.7. 1.5 Calculation of the rate of reaction between the teeth and the drinks.FormulaCalculationsLemon JuiceRate of response ==CokeRate of Reaction ==CoffeeRate of Reaction ==100 PlusRate of Reaction ==Sugar SolutionRate of Reaction ==Tap WaterRate of Reaction ==7.1.6 Calculation for the standard error of the rate of reaction.FormulaWhere,= uncertainty of the mass= rate of reactionExampleLemon juiceCokeCoffee100 PlusSugar SolutionTap WaterType of DrinkspH ValueDuration of Experiment/ monthsAverage Difference in Mass/ mgRate of Reaction/ mg/dayLemon juice2.1050.080.004Coke2.3050.070.007Coffee4.9550.050.007100 Plus3.7850.070.008Sugar solution7.0050.050.011Tap water7.0050.010.009The table shows the summary of the calculations in the experiment.7.2 Data Presentation7.3 statistical Analysis7.3.1 T-test lemon juice and sugar solution.1st Montht-Test diametric Two prototype for MeansVariable 1Variable 2Mean2.0241.738 version0.396830.18467Observations55Pearson Correlation-0.933627334Hypothesi zed Mean Difference0.286df4t Stat2.38114E-16P(T0.5t small one-tail2.131846786P(T1t Critical two-tail2.776445105To do a T-test, I came up with two hypotheses, which are as followedThe difference between the average mass of the teeth in lemon juice and sugar solution for the 1st month is not significant.The difference between the average mass of the teeth in lemon juice and sugar solution for the 1st month is significant.From the result of T-test generated by Microsoft excel 2010, the value of is and the value of is. Thus, . Therefore, is accepted and is rejected. This means that from the T-test, the difference between the average mass of the teeth in lemon juice and sugar solution for the 1st month is not significant. This is because all the teeth used in this experiment have an average mass initially.7.3.2 T-test between lemon juice and sugar solution2nd Montht-Test Paired Two Sample for MeansVariable 1Variable 2Mean2.0161.728Variance0.398580.18127Observations55Pearson Correlation -0.938299713Hypothesized Mean Difference0.288df4